Bad news, incidents and personal stories
Two routes: a first statement for bad news about an organization or business, and the conditions to ask for before telling a painful personal story.
- Start here: the essentials
- 1. Which route to read, and who speaks
- 2. Route A: bad news about an organization or business
- 3. Route B: a personal or painful story
- 4. For both routes: what is public and what this manual cannot settle
- 5. See it
- 6. Practice
- 7. Your interview
- 8. Check your work
- 9. Knowledge check and scenario
Start here Essentials
At minimum, decide who speaks and put the result on the statements sheet. Read the route that matches your topic; the other route can wait.
- Pick your route from your topic: bad news about a business or organization, a personal or painful story, or neither (which route to read).
- Decide who speaks: you, someone on your behalf, or a written statement (who speaks).
- Fill the sheet for your route. For bad news, write a first statement. For a personal story, list your conditions and off-limits topics. If neither fits, write "not needed" in the conditions list (statements sheet).
- Tell the reporter your conditions, or send your statement, before the interview starts, and agree on a signal to stop (telling the reporter).
- Write one question to ask the person who settles the legal line if a case, inspection, claim or employer policy is involved (who settles it).
Minimum time: about 30 minutes for a first statement or a conditions list; about 5 minutes if your topic is routine. Done when: the statements sheet shows who speaks and either a first statement, a list of conditions, or "not needed".
1. Which route to read, and who speaks Understand
This chapter has two routes because the two situations ask different things of you. Route A is for bad news about an organization or business: an incident, a failed inspection, a complaint, a mistake. Route B is for a personal or painful story: something that happened to you or your family, which a reporter, host or producer wants you to tell. Section 1 and section 4 are shared. Read them whichever route you take.
Which route to read
Your setup's topic answers this for you. Without a setup, use the table.
| Your situation | Read | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A business or organization you speak for has had an incident, a failed inspection, a complaint or a mistake | Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Route A) | The questions are about what the organization knows, is doing and can say |
| A crime, injury, death, illness or loss happened to you or your family, and you are asked to talk about it | Sections 1, 3 and 4 (Route B) | The questions are about whether you speak, and on what terms |
| Both: for example, you were hurt in an accident at your employer | Route B for your own story, then Route A for what the employer says | Your terms are yours to set; the employer's statement is the employer's (see who speaks) |
| Routine topic (a project, an event, an explainer) | Sections 1 and 4, then stop | Write "who speaks: me" and mark the conditions list "not needed" |
| Contested or controversial topic, with no incident | Sections 1 and 4, then Hard and unexpected questions | Hard questions are practiced there |
| Not sure | The opening paragraph of section 2 and of section 3 | One of them will describe your situation |
Terms used on this page: a first statement is a short written account of what happened as far as you know, ready before the first call. A spokesperson is a person who speaks or writes for you or your organization. Conditions are terms you ask a reporter to accept, such as the place of the interview or topics left out. On the record means anything you say can be quoted with your name. The glossary collects the rest.
Who speaks
There are three ways to respond to a request when the subject is bad news or painful. Each gives you something and costs you something.
| Option | What it gives | What it costs |
|---|---|---|
| You speak | Your own words and tone; you can answer follow-up questions | Anything you say can be quoted; you answer live questions you did not choose |
| Someone speaks for you | One person handles calls and the facts; you do not face every question | That person must know the facts and your wishes; a reporter may still ask for you |
| A written statement | Fixed words, checked before they go out; a written statement leaves less room for a misquote, according to a victims' guide from Justice Solutions hosted by the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission (A News Media Guide for Victims and Survivors of Crime) | No answers to follow-up questions; the outlet decides how much of it to use |
For an organization, the CDC's crisis manual stresses one consistent message. Its example is the 2003 Michigan blackout, when two neighboring counties gave different restaurant rules and the public could not tell which to follow (CDC, CERC: Messages and Audiences). If several people in your organization might be called, name one voice and tell the others to refer calls to that person.
For a personal story, the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) says a spokesperson can be an attorney, an advocate, a clergy member, a family member or a friend, and that the spokesperson can release written statements for you (OVC, Advocating With the News Media). The guide is archived and no longer updated.
This chapter does not tell you whether to speak, and it does not tell you whether your employer, a contract or a law allows you to. If you speak for an employer, ask its media contact first: NC State, for example, asks faculty and staff to contact its news office before responding to a reporter (NC State News Services), and other employers have their own rules. Ask the authority Whether a policy binds you is a question for your employer or a lawyer.
2. Route A: bad news about an organization or business Route A
Use this route when an incident, inspection result, complaint or mistake involves a business or organization you speak for, and a reporter has called or may. The guidance below comes from the CDC's Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) manual, which was written for public health agencies in emergencies. Marcus Bell's cooler is far smaller than an outbreak. Treat CERC as agency guidance scaled down, not as a procedure tested on small businesses. Agency guidance
The six principles
CERC names six principles for communicating in a crisis. The table gives the CDC's idea for each in our words, and what it looks like in a first statement (CDC, CERC: Introduction).
| Principle | The CDC's idea | In your statement |
|---|---|---|
| Be first | Crises are time-sensitive, and the first source people hear from often becomes the one they prefer | Have the statement ready before the first call, and give it to every outlet that asks |
| Be right | Accuracy establishes credibility; information can include what is known, what is not known and what is being done to fill the gaps | Check each fact against a document or the office that owns it |
| Be credible | Honesty and truthfulness should not be compromised | Say what you do not know instead of filling the gap |
| Express empathy | Acknowledge suffering in words; addressing what people feel builds trust | Open with one sentence of concern or regret |
| Promote action | Meaningful things to do calm anxiety and give people some sense of control | Say what people should do, in positive form where you can |
| Show respect | Respect matters most when people feel vulnerable | Use plain words; assign no blame; do not talk down |
The order of a first statement
For the first minutes of a crisis, CERC says to express empathy, explain the risk simply, promote action and describe what is being done. It adds that people can take in only so much at once, so keep the first message short and skip the background (CDC, CERC: Introduction; Messages and Audiences). The statements sheet follows that order with a field for each part. Write the facts first because they are easiest; when you say the statement aloud, open with the concern. Our arrangement of the CDC's order
| Field | What goes in it | Check before you write it |
|---|---|---|
| Who speaks | One name, or "written statement only" | Does the person know they are the voice? |
| What happened, as far as we know | Two or three facts you can document | Could you point to a record, a measurement or a person for each? |
| Concern or regret | One sentence about the people affected | Is it about them, not about your reputation? |
| What is being done | Actions already taken or scheduled | Did it happen, or is it a plan? Say which. |
| What people should do | One to three actions, phrased as things to do | Is a public office the right place to send people? |
| What we cannot share yet, and why | The item and the reason | Is the reason one of the three in the section below? |
| Next update | A time or an event | Can you meet it? |
Say what you know, what you do not know, and what you are doing
The CDC's formula is to state what you know, what you do not know, and what you are doing to find out more, and to avoid speculating. If the facts change, update quickly (CDC, CERC: Messages and Audiences). The CDC's spokesperson chapter adds model wording: the situation is developing, we do not yet have all the facts, and based on what we know we expect a particular outcome. It also advises against assumptions and against promises that may have to be reversed later (CDC, CERC: Spokesperson). Agency guidance
Communicating uncertainty covers how to state uncertainty and numbers. The point here is narrower: a first statement has a line for what is not known, and that line is written down before a reporter asks for it.
Do not hide bad news
The CDC's chapter on working with the media says to get the good news out fast "and the bad news faster" (CDC, CERC: Working with the Media). The World Health Organization's 2017 guideline on emergency risk communication reports a systematic review in which several practices predicted higher trust, including speed and not concealing negative information such as casualty rates (WHO, Communicating risk in public health emergencies). Both documents are about public health emergencies. They support the habit of saying the bad fact yourself. They do not tell a small business what it may release, which the next Limits box covers.
Regret, not defense
The CDC's advice on acknowledging a mistake is to be regretful and not defensive, to avoid telling people not to be afraid, to avoid assigning blame through the media, and not to promise more than can be delivered (CDC, CERC: Spokesperson). In practice that means a sentence about the people affected, a plain fact about what went wrong, and a commitment only to actions you control. This is the only apology guidance this manual found and read; we found no research on how apologies work for small businesses. One agency's guidance
This manual does not give legal advice on what an organization may admit, or on whether a statement affects a lawsuit, an insurance claim, an inspection, an investigation or a prosecution. A sentence of regret, a description of a cause or a promise can matter to any of them. Your organization's lawyer or insurer, or the agency running the inspection or investigation, settles that. Ask the authority Ask before the statement goes out, not after.
When you cannot share something
If you cannot share a fact, say why. The CDC lists three honest reasons: you are verifying it, you are notifying the people affected, or it is not yours to release (CDC, CERC: Messages and Audiences). The spokesperson chapter gives the matching lines: it is under investigation, no decision has been made, or you are not the right person to answer (CDC, CERC: Spokesperson). Both sources advise against "no comment." Hard and unexpected questions has the short version for a doorstep.
Run a privacy check before you name anyone. The CDC's media chapter notes that some details may violate the privacy of victims and their families (CDC, CERC: Working with the Media). In a business, the people affected may be employees, customers or neighbors. Leave names out unless each person has agreed.
Questions reporters ask in a crisis
The CDC lists the questions reporters commonly ask in an emergency. The table pairs each with what to prepare. The deck at practice question deck has more, filterable by bad news.
| Question | Prepare |
|---|---|
| What is happening now? | The "what happened" field, in two sentences |
| Who is in charge? | The one voice, and the office that owns the facts |
| Are the hurt getting help? Is it contained? | Only what you can document; otherwise "we do not know yet" with what you are doing to find out |
| What should people do? | The "what people should do" field |
| Why did this happen? Was there warning? Why wasn't this prevented? | The CDC says not to speculate: repeat the facts and describe the effort to find the cause |
| What aren't you telling us? | The "cannot share yet, and why" field |
A hostile public meeting
If the audience is angry, the CDC's spokesperson chapter advises validating the emotion first ("I understand why you are angry"), acknowledging past mistakes where they occurred, and then looking forward. It gives the example of wishing you had met with people sooner (CDC, CERC: Spokesperson). The chapter is written for officials at public meetings. We did not find guidance for a business owner facing a crowd.
The two CDC chapters disagree about humor
The 2018 chapter on messages advises against humor in emergency communication. The 2014 spokesperson chapter says to use it with caution and calls it a minefield during a crisis. Neither chapter covers an ordinary interview. This manual makes no rule: in Route A, a first statement has no room for a joke, and the question is only whether to reach for one later.
3. Route B: a personal or painful story Route B
Use this route when something happened to you or your family, such as a crime, an injury, a death or an illness, and a reporter, host or producer asks you to tell it. The guidance comes from US victim-services and children's-rights sources, not from counselors. You decide whether to speak. This section gives you the questions, not an answer.
Support. This manual is not counseling. If you would like to talk with someone now, you can call or text 988 in the US. A support person can also come to the interview, if you ask for that (see conditions below).
Decide whether to speak
The OVC's guide lists questions to ask yourself before agreeing (OVC, Advocating With the News Media). The table pairs each with what asking it brings out.
| Question | What it brings out |
|---|---|
| What are your goals? | A change you want, a person you want remembered, or nothing in particular; the answer shapes what you say |
| Are you willing to face reporters who may not understand your pain? | Whether you can answer a question that misses it |
| Would the interview invade your privacy? | What you are willing to have public, and for how long |
| Does refusing increase or decrease your control? | That coverage can run without you (below) |
| Would you prefer a spokesperson? | The options in who speaks |
| Would it affect the investigation or prosecution? | A question for the prosecutor's victim advocate before you agree |
The OVC also says that refusing an interview does not prevent publicity about your case. A story can run with other sources. So refusing is a choice about what you control, not a way to keep out of the news. Agency guidance
Benefits and risks
Two victim guides set out what people have found on each side. The Justice Solutions guide hosted by North Carolina lists benefits (it can show the human effect, validate victims and encourage others to seek help) and risks (trauma can be compounded, and coverage can cause what it calls secondary victimization, meaning further harm from the way the story or its aftermath treats you). The Voices Center for Resilience tip sheet is written for people affected by mass violence, so some of its points will not fit every situation, but several carry over (Voices Center for Resilience, Considerations for Speaking with the Media).
| Possible benefits | Possible risks |
|---|---|
| Shows the human effect; may validate you (NC guide) | Re-traumatization and loss of privacy (Voices) |
| May encourage others to seek help (NC guide) | Photos you supply may be reused months or years later (Voices) |
| Public awareness; support for victim services; policy change (Voices) | Interference with an investigation; disagreement within the family (Voices) |
| Honors the person lost (Voices) | Feeling abandoned when coverage moves on; aggressive reporting at funerals, trials and anniversaries (Voices) |
| A podcaster or blogger may clip and spin a statement (Oregon DOJ) |
The Oregon Department of Justice makes the last point in its tips for bias-crime victims (Oregon DOJ, Tips for Bias Crime Victims Interacting with the Media). We found no source that teaches how to handle harassment after a story runs, so this manual names it as a risk and gives no method.
The benefits and risks above come from guides written for crime victims and survivors. They do not predict what a particular outlet will do with your story, and they do not say whether speaking is right for you. You decide. If a case, an investigation or a claim is open, the prosecutor's victim advocate or a lawyer settles whether speaking could affect it. Ask the authority
Conditions you can ask for
The OVC and the NC guide list what you can ask a reporter to agree to. The statements sheet has a line for each. Reporters will most likely comply with reasonable requests, says the OVC, but they may not. The NC guide adds that you can ask what the story is about, but editors usually have the last say.
| Condition | What it does | Source |
|---|---|---|
| The time and place of the interview | Lets you choose a setting where you feel steady | OVC; NC guide |
| A support person present | Someone else in the room | OVC; NC guide; Voices |
| Topics that are off-limits | Names what the reporter will not ask | OVC |
| Advance information about the questions or the angle | Reduces surprise; the reporter may give a topic and not a full list | OVC; NC guide |
| Identity protection (no name, no face, voice changed) | The OVC mentions silhouette and voice distortion; Voices mentions silhouette or no photo | OVC; Voices |
| A specific reporter, or one reporter at a time | Limits how many people ask the same thing | OVC; NC guide |
| No children or other family in the interview or pictures | Keeps others out of coverage you chose | OVC; Voices |
| A written statement instead of an interview | See who speaks | NC guide |
| A signal that ends the interview | Lets you stop without explaining | NC guide |
| Recording the interview yourself | Gives you your own copy; tell the reporter. Recording laws vary by state, so ask the advocate or a lawyer if you are unsure. | Oregon DOJ; Voices |
You can also decline any question and end the interview at any time. The NC guide says this applies even if you agreed earlier. These are not conditions you earn. They are choices you hold; the reporter may not accept the conditions, and then you decide what to do next.
Tell the reporter before the interview starts
State your conditions in writing before the interview, and ask the reporter to confirm them in writing. A reply that says "yes" to some and silence on others tells you where you stand. In person or on the phone, repeat the conditions and the stop signal as the first thing you say, before any recording starts. The NC guide recommends agreeing ground rules, including a signal to end, before you begin. Choose a signal you can say or do without explaining: a word, a raised hand, or "I'd like to pause."
Sample message (fictional sender, general wording): "Thank you for asking. Before we agree on a time, these are my conditions: we talk at my kitchen table; my sister sits in; no questions about the other driver; my son is not named or pictured unless he and I both agree. I have a word that means stop, and I will use it. Please confirm each in writing."
If the reporter will not agree
Some conditions may not be met, such as leaving a topic out. In order of what keeps the most control for the least cost:
- Ask again, with the reason, and ask what the reporter can promise instead.
- Offer a written statement, or a different reporter.
- Agree to the interview and decline the question in the room. The OVC gives a polite refusal as an example ("I'm sorry, but I don't want to talk about that"), followed by a return to what matters to you.
- Decline the interview. The story may still run (see above).
Practice the refusal aloud once, with the exact words you will use. It is easier to say a sentence you have already said.
Children in a story
UNICEF's reporting guidelines say a child's interview needs permission from both the child and the guardian, in writing where possible, given without coercion, in the child's language, and with an understanding that a story may spread widely. They also say to avoid questions that bring back the child's pain (UNICEF, Ethical reporting guidelines). NPR's ethics handbook says it requires a parent's or guardian's permission to interview a minor on a sensitive subject (NPR Ethics Handbook: Respect). Voices says young children can and should be left out of interviews.
For a parent, the working rule is our convention built on those sources: do not put a child's name, face, school or details in an interview, a photo or the media kit unless the child and you have both agreed, and keep the child out of the room. Convention This manual does not say what age or what law decides who may consent. That depends on the outlet, the state and the case.
What reporters' own guidance asks of them
Knowing the standards helps you ask for them. The Society of Professional Journalists' code, revised in October 2026, asks journalists to show heightened sensitivity with crime victims and juveniles, to weigh the permanence of publication, and to recognize that private people have more right to control information about themselves than public figures. The code is voluntary and not legally enforceable. NPR's handbook says to take extra care with people unused to interviews and to give them a few extra minutes before taping. The OVC advises reporters to approach without equipment first, accept refusals, and offer anonymity only when they can reasonably keep that promise. These are standards, not promises about any one reporter. Convention
Off the record
Our default is to treat everything as on the record, including what you say before and after the recording. An off-the-record arrangement exists in journalism, but the words mean different things at different outlets, and it counts only if the reporter agrees before you speak. A first-time interviewee should not rely on it. If there is a detail you want kept out, do not say it. Convention
Off the record: what the victim guides say
| Source | What it says |
|---|---|
| OVC | Tells victims not to speak off the record |
| Voices Center for Resilience | Tells survivors not to speak off the record, and to stop talking once they have answered |
| Oregon DOJ | Says you can mark parts of your statement as off the record |
| This manual | Default is on the record; an agreement must come first, and a first-time interviewee should not rely on it |
The sources point the same way in practice (be careful) and differ on whether it is an option. We did not find a source that settles it for every outlet.
Children in UNICEF's guidelines
UNICEF's guidelines also say to avoid staging, to limit the number of interviewers, and to withhold a child's home or whereabouts if revealing them could endanger the child. They say the child or guardian must know they are talking to a reporter and be told the purpose and intended use. They apply to journalists, but you can ask for the same terms. Read them at UNICEF, Ethical reporting guidelines.
4. For both routes: what is public and what this manual cannot settle Both routes
What you say to a reporter, producer or host is public, and it stays public. The Oregon Department of Justice puts it as "public and permanent" (Oregon DOJ). Photos you supply may be reused later. Assume that anything you say to an outlet can be quoted, from the first greeting to the last goodbye.
If a case, an investigation, an inspection or a claim is open, ask before you speak. The Oregon DOJ notes that even small inconsistencies in what you say may hurt a later legal case. Ask the investigator, the prosecutor's victim advocate, your insurer or a lawyer, whichever fits.
Keep a few things out of what you tell reporters, and out of anything you share from this manual's media kit: your home address, private phone numbers, and anything about a child. The kit's sheets do not ask for them. This is our convention that rests on the risks the Oregon DOJ lists (effects on children, school and employer, and the risk of being outed). It asks for nothing; it asks you to leave things out. Convention
Who settles it
Many of the questions around a hard interview are not answered by this manual or by the reporter. The table names who answers each.
| Question | Who settles it |
|---|---|
| What an inspection report says, and whether it is public | The agency that issued it |
| Whether an illness is linked to a business | The health department |
| Whether your words affect an insurance claim, a complaint or an inspection | Your insurer or a lawyer |
| Whether a sentence of regret or a description of a cause creates liability | The organization's lawyer or insurer |
| Whether a criminal case is open, and whether speaking affects it | The prosecutor's victim advocate, or a lawyer |
| Whether you may speak for your employer | The employer's media contact or policy; a lawyer for the law |
| Whether a child is named or pictured | The child and the guardian, both |
| Whether a recording you make is lawful | State law; a lawyer |
| Whether the outlet agrees to a condition | The reporter, then the editor |
5. See it See it
Route A: Marcus Bell's first statement. Marcus owns Bell's Bakery, two shops in Harlan Falls, Pennsylvania. The county health department closes his Main Street shop after an inspection; a TV crew from Valley 12 News is outside the next morning, and the Harlan Falls Ledger emails for comment. Every name, place, outlet, figure and quote in this example is invented.
Known: the inspector measured the walk-in cooler at 47°F (fictional figure); the county closed the shop; the cooler was repaired that afternoon; a reinspection is needed before the shop reopens. Assumed: that the reinspection happens Thursday (Marcus's assumption; the health department sets the date); that his wording of regret is acceptable (he checks it with his insurer or a lawyer before it goes out). Open: what the report says and whether it is public (the health department); whether any illness is linked to the shop (the health department; none is known today, and Marcus does not speculate); whether anything he says affects his insurance or a complaint (his insurer or a lawyer); whether he says anything at the door (his choice; Hard and unexpected questions has the short line).
| Field | Marcus's entry |
|---|---|
| Who speaks | Marcus Bell, for both outlets; no employee gives interviews |
| What happened, as far as we know | On Tuesday the county health department measured our Main Street walk-in cooler at 47°F and closed the shop |
| Concern or regret | We are sorry to our customers and to our staff |
| What is being done | We repaired the cooler Tuesday afternoon. The shop stays closed until the county reinspects. |
| What people should do | If you have a health concern, contact your doctor or the county health department |
| What we cannot share yet, and why | We have not received the county's full report; the county issues it. We have not been told of any illness linked to the shop, and we will not guess. |
| Next update | When the county reinspects; we expect Thursday and will post the result at the shop door |
Said aloud, with the concern first, the statement runs about 100 words, roughly 40 seconds at 150 words a minute (a round figure that is not measured for any one speaker). The CDC suggests 30 seconds and under 90 words for a key point, so Marcus can say the first four sentences aloud and leave the rest in writing. Marcus sends it by email to the Ledger and to Valley 12 at the same time, which is the CDC's point about giving every outlet equal access. At the door, he can say one sentence and point to the written statement. What he does not do is guess about illness, blame the inspector, or promise a reopening date the county has not set.
Route B: Teresa Lindqvist's conditions. Teresa lives in Tacoma, Washington. Two years ago her son Eli, then 15, was seriously injured by a driver at an unmarked crosswalk near his school. Eli has recovered and is 17. Teresa now asks the city council for a signal at that crosswalk. A local podcast, Crossing Lines, asks for a 60-minute taped episode, and after the council vote the Tacoma Tribune-Record asks for a short phone interview. All names, outlets and details are invented.
Known: the conditions she sets. Assumed: that the host will agree (Teresa's assumption; the host's written reply settles it) and that the driver's case may still be open (assumed; the prosecutor's victim advocate settles it). Open: whether Eli consents to be named (Eli and Teresa, both); how the podcast is edited and when it posts (she asks the host; Radio and podcasts); whether the newspaper leaves out the driver questions (the reporter may not).
| Condition | Teresa's note |
|---|---|
| Time and place I choose | Her kitchen table |
| A support person present | Her sister sits in |
| Topics that are off-limits | No questions about the driver |
| Identity protected | Not needed; Teresa speaks under her own name |
| No children in the interview or pictures | Eli is not named or pictured unless he and she both agree |
| A written statement instead | Not for the podcast; she keeps a short one ready in case she declines a later call |
| A signal to stop | A word she has chosen and told the host |
| Quotes read back if offered | She asks the Tribune-Record reporter whether a read-back is offered; the outlet decides |
If the Tribune-Record reporter says the driver questions will be asked, Teresa has the order above: ask again with the reason, offer a written statement, decline the question in the room with her prepared sentence, or decline the interview. The story can still run if she declines. She does not have to decide until she has the reporter's answer in writing.
6. Practice Practice
Minimum: decide who speaks and write it on the statements sheet, then fill either the first statement (Route A) or the conditions (Route B), or write "not needed". Time: about 45 minutes for a full pass; 5 minutes if your topic is routine. Materials: the statements and conditions sheet (essential if your topic is bad news or personal; optional otherwise), a phone to time yourself, and, if you can, one person to read the questions.
- Write who speaks in the first field of the first statement. If it is someone else, ask them now, and write down what they need from you.
- Route A: fill the other fields. For each fact, write beside it the document or office that proves it. Read the statement aloud and time it; the CDC suggests getting a key point out in 30 seconds and under 90 words (CDC, CERC: Spokesperson), so check that your opening concern and facts fit. The answer timer counts words and shows seconds at your rate.
- Route B: tick the conditions you want and write a note for each. Choose your stop signal. Write the one sentence you will use to decline a question, and say it aloud.
- Ask the person who settles the legal line (see who settles it) the one question that applies to you. Write the answer, or "not yet answered," on the sheet.
- Send your statement, or your conditions, before the interview starts, and ask the reporter to confirm in writing.
- Say three hard questions aloud from the practice question deck, filtered to your situation, and record them. Play them back with the playback checklist on the practice answers sheet.
7. Your interview Your interview
8. Check your work Check your work
Criteria
- Does the sheet name one person as the voice, or a written statement only?
- Route A: could you point to a record, measurement or office for each fact, and does the statement say what is not known and why?
- Route A: is there a line of regret or concern, and no blame, speculation or promise you cannot keep?
- Route B: does each condition have a note, including the stop signal, and is the child's name or picture covered?
- Does each open legal question name who settles it?
- Did you tell the reporter your conditions, or send your statement, before the interview, and ask for confirmation?
Worked example
Check Marcus's sheet against the criteria. One voice: yes. Each fact has a source: the inspector's measurement and the repair he saw himself. Regret: yes, one line, with no blame of the inspector. Not known: the report and illness are listed as not known, with the health department named. Promises: the reopening date is "we expect," not "will," because the county sets it. Under these assumptions the statement is ready to send; the wording of regret is not final until his insurer or a lawyer has looked at it. Check Teresa's sheet: each condition has a note, the stop word is chosen and told to the host, and Eli is covered. What her sheet cannot say is whether the driver's case is open; her note says to ask the victim advocate before the recording.
Common mistakes
- Writing a statement that opens with background. Fix: open with the concern and the facts.
- Filling "what is being done" with plans written as if they were finished. Fix: label each as done or scheduled.
- Skipping the legal question because the reporter is waiting. Fix: say you will respond by a time, and ask first.
- Listing conditions but not telling the reporter. Fix: send them in writing before the interview.
- Treating a condition as a guarantee. Fix: the reporter may not agree, and you decide what to do then.
What is still unresolved
This chapter cannot tell you what you may admit, whether speaking affects a case, whether you may speak for an employer, or whether to speak. The people named in the table in section 4 settle the first three, and you settle the last. It also cannot tell you what the outlet will use. Hard and unexpected questions and Communicating uncertainty cover the questions that follow, and After the interview covers what to do if the story gets something wrong.