Reference
Resource library
Free guides, outlet policies and research behind this manual, grouped by what they help with, with the date each was checked.
Every link below was checked on October 18, 2026. We re-check them every year; the next check is due October 18, 2027. We receive nothing from any of these publishers, and none of the links carries a tracking or referral code. Several outlets describe their own practice here; none of it binds a reporter, and a podcast or creator may follow none of it. Where two sources differ, the chapter says so.
Before you say yes, and the ground rules
| Resource | Publisher | What it gives |
| Five tips for scientists handling media requests | SciLine (AAAS) | The four questions to ask before you agree, and when to refer a colleague. |
| Five tips for scientists speaking to reporters | SciLine (AAAS) | Default to on the record, keep three points, and say when you do not know. |
| Ask a Reporter Anything | SciLine (AAAS) | Working journalists on deadlines, headlines, embargoes and fixing a bad quote. |
| Faculty support: working with the media | North Carolina State University | A university tip sheet on news values, read-backs and corrections. |
| Preparing for a media interview | University of Texas at San Antonio | What counts as on the record, including before and after. |
| Media contacts | University of Colorado system | A short example of saying which hat you wear: expertise, experience or the institution. |
| Media and mass communication policy | University of Connecticut | An example that separates official statements from personal speech. |
| Protected concerted activity | National Labor Relations Board | A pointer: some employee speech about working conditions is legally protected. Ask a lawyer. |
| On background is common journalism lingo | Poynter Institute | What the term means to different journalists, and a case where an email marked off the record was published. |
| Embargo agreement | EurekAlert! (AAAS) | What a reporter agrees to when they accept an embargo. |
| Introduction to the Reporter's Recording Guide | Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press | One-party and all-party consent for recording a call. A legal summary, not advice. |
| Reporter's Recording Guide | Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press | State-by-state recording laws, as a pointer. |
How outlets handle quotes, review and corrections
| Resource | Publisher | What it gives |
| News Values and Principles: Telling the Story | The Associated Press | AP's definitions of on the record, background and deep background, and its rules on quotes and corrections. |
| Statement of News Values and Principles | The Associated Press | AP's short statement, including no advance approval and no full question lists. |
| Ethics Handbook: Independence | NPR | NPR's rule against previewing stories with sources, and its exceptions. |
| Ethics Handbook: Fairness | NPR | How NPR treats interviewees, editing and pre-interviews. |
| Ethics Handbook: Honesty | NPR | Recording someone without their knowledge, and online contact. |
| Ethics Handbook: Respect | NPR | Extra care for people new to interviews, children and people in distress. |
| Ethical Journalism | The New York Times | Sharing drafts, fact-checking with sources, recording and identifying yourself. |
| Journalistic Standards and Values | Reuters | Quote review, quote editing, ground rules and recording. |
| SPJ Code of Ethics (revised October 2026) | Society of Professional Journalists | A voluntary code. Compare any guide that still quotes the 2014 version. |
| RTDNA Code of Ethics | Radio Television Digital News Association | The broadcast industry's voluntary code. |
| The New York Times bans quote approval | Poynter Institute | The 2012 background to quote approval. |
| Corrections | NPR | A live example of an outlet's corrections page and how to report an error. |
| NPR Public Editor | NPR | An example of a route above the reporter. |
| Correcting the record: experts weigh in on ethical news corrections | Center for Journalism Ethics, University of Wisconsin-Madison | The difference between an update and a correction. |
| Times Public Editor blasts sneak interview | Ethics AdviceLine for Journalists | The norm against ambush interviews, with a case. |
| Editorial Guidelines, privacy section (doorstep interviews) | BBC (a UK comparison) | The most explicit published doorstep rules. Not a US source. |
Main points, plain language and timing
| Resource | Publisher | What it gives |
| The Message Box | COMPASS Science Communication | A five-part worksheet: Issue, Problem, So What, Solutions, Benefits. |
| The Message Box, blank worksheet | COMPASS Science Communication | The one-page blank form. Free for personal and educational use. |
| Communication Toolkit | AAAS | Bottom line first, then the so-what, then detail. |
| Message Mapping | Vincent Covello, in an archived EPA copy | The source of the 27-word, 9-second, three-message rule. One practitioner's method, with no cited basis. |
| CERC: Messages and Audiences | US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | First messages, credibility and the known, not known, being done formula. |
| Plain language guides | Digital.gov | The federal government's current plain language guides. |
| Would you say it that way? Tips on writing for your voice | NPR Training | Writing for the ear. |
| Soundbite essentials | NPR Training | How producers choose clips: 5 to 15 seconds is ideal. |
| Speaking rate | Tools for Clear Speech, Baruch College (CUNY) | How to measure your own speaking rate. |
| Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation | University of Pennsylvania (Interspeech 2006) | Measured American phone-conversation rates, and why the number depends on how pauses are counted. |
| Sound Bite Democracy | Daniel Hallin, Wilson Quarterly (1992) | The fall in average soundbite length in network election coverage, 1968 to 1988. |
| Sound Bite Democracy: network evening news presidential campaign coverage, 1968 and 1988 | Shorenstein Center, Harvard Kennedy School | A second study of the same period with slightly different figures. |
| Media Interview Skills (WC114) | University of Florida IFAS Extension | Two or three points, 20-second answers, a recorded mock interview. |
| Media training resources | UNC Health | Five likely questions plus the one you hope not to get, and blocking and bridging. |
| Interview tips | Saint Louis University | A university tip sheet on practicing aloud. |
Radio, podcasts, video and TV
Hard questions and false claims
Uncertainty and numbers
| Resource | Publisher | What it gives |
| CERC: Introduction | US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | The six principles of crisis and emergency risk communication. |
| Communicating risk in public health emergencies | World Health Organization | Guideline recommendations on being transparent about what is known. |
| Communicating Science Effectively: a research agenda | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine | What the research says on uncertainty, verbal probabilities and numbers. |
| Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science | van der Bles and colleagues, Royal Society Open Science | A framework and nine ways to express uncertainty. |
| The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust | van der Bles and colleagues, PNAS | Experiments on numeric ranges and verbal hedges. |
| Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science | Kreps and Kriner, Science Advances | Evidence that emphasizing uncertainty can reduce trust in some contexts. |
| Negative consequences of failing to communicate uncertainties during a pandemic | Batteux and colleagues, BMJ Open | Overstated certainty backfires when contrary information arrives. |
| No harm in being self-corrective | Altenmuller and colleagues, Public Understanding of Science | Evidence that admitting error can raise credibility. |
| Guidance note for lead authors of the Fifth Assessment Report | IPCC | The IPCC likelihood and confidence scales. |
| Intelligence Community Directive 203: Analytic Standards | Office of the Director of National Intelligence | The US intelligence probability scale. |
| Communicating risks and benefits: an evidence-based user's guide | US Food and Drug Administration | Ten recommendations on numbers, including absolute risks and constant denominators. |
| Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics | Gigerenzer and colleagues, Psychological Science in the Public Interest | The 1995 pill scare as the standard relative-versus-absolute example. |
| Making Data Talk: a workbook | National Cancer Institute | Plain rules for numbers in public communication. |
| Fact boxes | Harding Center for Risk Literacy | A format that shows benefits and harms side by side. |
Bad news, personal stories and children
Other courses, for reference
These are listed so you can see what else exists. We have not used their lessons. Prices and schedules change; we do not state them. Nothing here is an endorsement, and nothing on this site is for sale.
| Cost | Course | Provider type |
| Free | SciLine, Engaging with the media (AAAS) | Nonprofit |
| Free | AAAS Communication Toolkit | Nonprofit |
| Free | COMPASS, The Message Box | Nonprofit |
| Free | NPR Training, guides for reporters | News organization |
| Free | CDC, Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication manual | Federal agency |
| Free | FEMA EMI, IS-29.A Public Information Officer Awareness | Federal agency |
| Paid | LinkedIn Learning, Media Training Essentials | Course vendor |
| Paid | LinkedIn Learning, The Media-Savvy Professional | Course vendor |
| Paid | Coursera (Packt), Media Training: Radio | Course vendor |
| Paid | PRSA, From TV to TikTok: Next Gen Media Training | Professional association |
| Paid | COMPASS, Communicating Risk | Nonprofit |
| Paid | Maven, Media Training 101 | Course vendor |
LimitsA source appears here because it says something this manual relies on or compares, not because its advice fits every interview. Several are written for scientists, officials or crime victims. Guidance from a government agency or a university is not legal advice about your case.